Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionContact Us   |  Subscribe   |  Advertise   |  Login  Page layout
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
Lung India Official publication of Indian Chest Society  
  Users Online: 222   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
  Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 37  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 506-510  

Prognostic factors for sarcomatoid carcinomas of lung: A single-centre experience


Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey

Date of Submission29-Nov-2019
Date of Decision14-Mar-2020
Date of Acceptance30-Apr-2020
Date of Web Publication30-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Muhammet Sayan
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gazi University, School of Medicine, 06500 Ankara
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_525_19

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background: Although lung sarcomatoid carcinomas (LSCa) arised from the epithelial tissue, they have very distinctive features than other non-small cell lung carcinomas in terms of histopathology and survival. It constitutes 0.1%–0.4% of all lung cancers. The aim of our study is to evaluate the survival analysis of LSCa in a single thoracic surgery clinic and to determine the prognostic factors. Materials and Methods: It was a retrospective cohort study. After the approval of the local ethics committee, a total of 34 patients who were operated in our department between January 2010 and December 2018, whose pathologies were reported as sarcomatoid carcinoma was included in the study. The patients were analyzed by age, gender, presence of necrosis in the histopathological examination, tumor stage, tumor diameter, and tumor location. Results: There were 28 males and 6 females. The median age was 60 years (range: 36–80 years). The median survival was 42 months (32.6–52.2 months), and the 5-year overall survival was 33.6%. Significantly negative prognostic factors were tumor diameter and tumor stage (P = 0.003 and 0.001, respectively). Median disease-free interval (DFI) was 38 months (27.3–49.1 months), and 5-year DFI was 32.6%. Conclusion: LSCa are highly heterogeneous epithelial malignancies, and it has worse survival than other epithelial cancers. Relatively, satisfactory results can be obtained in these tumors with surgical treatment.

Keywords: Giant cell, pleomorphic carcinoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma, spindle cell


How to cite this article:
Sayan M, Bas A, Valiyev E, Celik A, Kurul IC, Aribas OK, Tastepe AI. Prognostic factors for sarcomatoid carcinomas of lung: A single-centre experience. Lung India 2020;37:506-10

How to cite this URL:
Sayan M, Bas A, Valiyev E, Celik A, Kurul IC, Aribas OK, Tastepe AI. Prognostic factors for sarcomatoid carcinomas of lung: A single-centre experience. Lung India [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 1];37:506-10. Available from: https://www.lungindia.com/text.asp?2020/37/6/506/299665




   Introduction Top


Lung sarcomatoid carcinomas (LSCa) are highly heterogeneous tumors, which include different carcinomas, and it constitutes 0.1%–0.4% of all lung malignancies.[1] According to the WHO 2015, LSCa were defined as epithelial lung malignancies, which include five different tumor histopathology. These are pleomorphic carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, giant cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, and pulmonary blastoma.[2] It has been reported in the literature that LSCa are more common in male and smoker. In spite of its anaplastic characteristics, many cases are surgically complete resectable.[3] Histopathologically, tumor cells are heterogeneous and pleomorphic in LSCa, hence, the diagnosis is difficult with a small biopsy sample, and precise diagnosis can usually be achieved with larger samples or all resected materials.[4] The common opinion in literature is that LSCa have the worst prognosis than other epithelial non-small cell lung cancers.[5] The aim of this study is analyzing the survival of the patients who underwent surgical treatment in our clinic, whose histopathologies were reported as LSCa and determined as negative prognostic factors.


   Materials and Methods Top


Patient selection

Following the approval of the local ethics committee (Gazi University Ethics Committee), the records of the patients who were operated with the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer between January 2011 and December 2018 were examined. Inclusion criteria were as follows: LSCa histopathology (one or combination of these: pleomorphic carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, giant cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, and pulmonary blastoma), complete resection (R0), and access to follow-up records (for overall and disease-free survival). Patients who underwent wedge resection and had true mesenchymal sarcoma pathology were not included in the study. Data of patients were analyzed according to the age, gender, tumor stage, tumor diameter, histopathologic subgroup, tumor location, presence of necrosis, visceral pleural invasion, lymph node invasion (hilar/mediastinal), type of resection, and whether given adjuvant therapy.

Statistical analysis

The overall survival (OS) was defined as the length of time as month from surgery to death or the final follow-up. Data of patients were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 (statistical package for windows manufactured by IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States). OS was analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier method with 95% confidence intervals. Survival differences between groups were analyzed using the Log-rank test and Cox regression test. Two-sided P values were calculated, and it was considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.


   Results Top


The clinico-pathologic features of patients are given in [Table 1]. A total of 34 patients who fulfilled the mentioned criteria were included in the study. There were 6 females and 28 males. The median age was 60 years (range: 36–80 years). Two patients had carcinosarcoma, nine patients had pure spindle or giant cell carcinoma, and 23 patients had mixed pathology. Mixed histopathologies were as follows: spindle cells accompanied squamous cell carcinoma in five patients, adenocarcinoma in five patients, and large cell carcinoma in two patients. Coexistence of giant cell and adenocarcinoma was detected in seven patients, and a combination of giant cells with squamous cell carcinoma was in one patient. Three patients had three tumor cell combination, including giant cell, spindle cell, and adenocarcinoma. In our series, there was no histopathology of pulmonary blastoma. While 22 patients had no lymph node invasion, there were hilar lymph node invasion (N1) in seven patients and mediastinal lymph node invasion (N2) in five patients. Visceral pleural invasion was detected in 17 patients, and parietal pleural invasion was detected in two patients. The tumor was located in upper zones in 20 cases, lower zones in nine cases, and pulmonary hilum in five cases. Pneumonectomy was performed in four patients, and extended resections (lung resection with chest wall resection or left atrial resection) were performed in six patients, while 24 patients underwent lobectomy (standard or sleeve lobectomy) or segmentectomy operation. Histopathologically, the necrosis was detected in six patient's specimens. Since it is difficult to diagnose sarcomatoid carcinoma in small tissue biopsies, preoperative diagnoses are often given as “nonsmall cell carcinoma” or “malignant epithelial tumor.” In our study, 24 of 34 patients (70.5%) had a diagnosis of preoperative malignant tumor, and only two of them diagnosed with pleomorphic carcinoma by transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy. The diagnosis was made in 10 patients (29.5%) as “nonsmall cell carcinoma” with intraoperative frozen section.
Table 1: Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients

Click here to view


The common complaint of patients was cough, followed by shortness of breath. The three patients had pleuritic chest pain. There were no any clinical symptoms in ten patients and their masses were detected incidentally. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was a platinum-based regimen and cisplatin or carboplatin plus docetaxel in 24 patients (70.6%) and cisplatin or carboplatin plus vinorelbine in 7 patients (20.6). Three patients (8.8%) whose tumor stages in stage information architecture according to the 8th tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) system for non-small cell lung cancer did not receive adjuvant treatment. The median survival was 42 months (32.6–52.2 months), and 5-year OS was 33.6% [Figure 1]. The OS was worse as statistically significant in Stage III patients group according to the 8th TNM staging system than earlier stages (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.9–12.3; [Figure 2]; P = 0.01). Patients were grouped according to tumor diameter as ≤ 5 cm, 5–7 cm and >7 cm, the worst median survival was in patients with >7 cm tumor as 13 months (range: 2–23 months), and this correlation was statistically significant (HR = 3.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.9–9.6; [Figure 3]; P = 0.02). When survival analysis was performed according to hilar/mediastinal lymph node invasion, the median survival was 44 months (34.1–55.6) in N0/N1 group and 19 months (3.4–35.3) in N2 group, but there was no statistically significant relationship (P = 0.10). Gender, age, and tumor location status had no significant effect on survival. Median disease-free interval (DFI) was 38 months (27.3–49.1), and 5-year DFI was 32.6%. DFI was negatively affected by pleural invasion (visceral and parietal), presence of necrosis, lack of adjuvant chemotherapy, and tumor stage and diameter, but this correlation was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).
Figure 1: Overall survival curve of patients (Kaplan–Meier method)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Survival comparison according to tumor diameter (Hazard ratio = 5.02; 95% confidence interval, P = 0.003)

Click here to view
Figure 3: There was a statistically significant correlation between survival and tumor stage (Hazard ratio = 3.12; 95% confidence interval, P = 0.02)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The sarcomatoid carcinomas of the lung (LSCa) arise from the epithelial tissue are a heterogeneous tumor that constitutes <1% of lung malignancies and have difficulties in both diagnostic and treatment strategies.[6] According to the 4th WHO classification published in 2015, LSCa were divided into five subgroups such as pleomorphic carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, giant cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, and pulmonary blastoma. LSCa may be composed of pure spindle or giant cell carcinoma, and it may also include adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma in different ratios. Diagnosis with small biopsy samples is difficult, and the final diagnosis is often obtained from the whole resected specimens.[2] It was reported that OS and DFI were very poor when compared with other nonsmall cell lung carcinomas, and the median survival was approximately 3 months in metastatic patients.[7] Histopathologically, immunohistochemical methods are frequently used to differentiate LSca from other epithelial, mesenchymal, and mesothelial tumors. The most commonly used immunohistochemical methods for the diagnosis of LSCa in the literature are cytokeratin (CK), transcription factor 1 (TTF1), and epithelial membrane antigen.[8] In our study, CK was found to be positive in 32 patients (94.1%) and TTF 1 in 30 (88.2%) patients. The other immunohistochemical methods used for differential diagnoses were Vimentin, S100, CD56, PanCK, and p63. According to the literature, the majority of LSCa patients are male gender and smokers, and the average age of them is from 60 to 70.[3] However, pulmonary blastoma is seen equally in both gender during the 4th decade.[9] The male-to-female ratio was 4.6, the mean age was 60 years, and the rate of smoking was 88.2% in our study, and these results were consistent with the literature. A total of 30 (88.2%) patients had a history of smoking (active, passive, or ex-smoker). The mean amount of smoking was 39.9 (standard deviation [SD]: 3.2) pack per year. Twenty-two patients (64.7%) were active smokers, six patients (17.6%) were ex-smokers, and the others were passive smokers. The mean exposure time was 41.2 (SD: 4.3). Histopathologically, pulmonary blastoma was not detected in our series. LSCa may be peripheral and central, and it is often located in the upper lobes.[9] In our study, five patients had central, 29 patients had peripheral tumor. Eighteen tumors (53%) were located in the upper zones and in 11 patients (32%) in the lower zones of lungs. The results of previous studies related to surgically treated LSCa are given in [Table 2]. Venissac et al. reported a 5-year survival rate of LSCa was 33%, and they stated that tumor size was an important prognostic factor.[10] Rossi et al. reported in their study, which included 75 cases, there were no patients who were living ≥5 years after the operation, the more important prognostic factor was tumor stage, and they no detected any correlation between survival and tumor histopathology.[11] Park et al. stated that the 5-year survival was 55%, and tumor stage, tumor diameter, and female gender were negative prognostic factors.[12] Raveglia indicated a median survival was 8 months, and remarkable prognostic factors were mediastinal lymph node invasion and tumor stage.[13] According to another study performed by Mochizuki et al. the 5-year survival of LSCa patients was 36.6, and the presence of necrosis, tumor stage, and lymphatic invasion were the worst prognostic factors.[14] Similarly, Nakajima et al. suggested negative prognostic factors for survival were tumor stage and lymph node invasion.[15] Lococo found in his study, including 70 patients, the 5-year survival was 12%, and the stage of tumor and the presence of tumor embolism were independent prognostic factors for survival.[16] In our study, the median survival was 41 months, and the 5-year OS was 33.6%. Statistically significant prognostic factors were determined as tumor diameter and tumor stage. Mediastinal lymph node invasions, presence of necrosis, and pure spindle cell or pure giant cell carcinoma histopathology were found to be adversely affected on survival, but these correlations were not statistically significant. There was no significant correlation between survival and tumor location, gender, age, and visceral pleural invasion. It is possible to find both very poor and satisfactory results related to DFI of LSCa in the literature.[4],[15],[16],[17],[18] Venissac et al. found that in the LSCa series, including 39 cases, DFI was worse as 4 months.[10] Mochizuki et al. reported 5-year DFI was 40.7%, necrosis and lymphatic spread were associated with recurrence and/or distant metastasis status. Mark reported a 5-year survival as 54.4%; and Martinez reported a mean survival was 49 months in their LSCa series.[5],[12] In our study, the median DFI was 38 months (27.3–49.1), and the 5-year DFI was 32.6%. Pleural invasion (visceral and parietal), necrosis, absence of adjuvant chemotherapy, and tumor stage and diameter had a negative effect on DFI, but this was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).
Table 2: Previous studies related to surgically treated pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma in the literature

Click here to view


Limitations of our study were as follows: it was a single-centered retrospective study, and it has a small number of cases. In this regard, there is a need for multi-centered prospective studies.


   Conclusion Top


It has been reported in the literature, LSCa is a highly heterogeneous tumor group, and it has a poor prognosis than other epithelial nonsmall cell lung carcinomas. In our study, we concluded that the results of the surgical treatment of LSCa were relative satisfactory in terms of DFI and OS, and significant prognostic factors were tumor diameter and stage.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Zhang X, Wang Y, Zhao L, Jing H, Sang S, Du J. Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e7465.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, Yatabe Y, Austin JH, Beasley MB, et al. The 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors: Impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J Thorac Oncol 2015;10:1243-60.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wick MR, Ritter JH, Humphrey PA. Sarcomatoid carcinomas of the lung: A clinicopathologic review. Am J Clin Pathol 1997;108:40-53.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Travis WD. Sarcomatoid neoplasms of the lung and pleura. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010;134:1645-58.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Avila Martínez RJ, Marrón Fernández C, Hermoso Alarza F, Zuluaga Bedoya M, Meneses Pardo JC, Gámez García AP. Primary pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas. Arch Bronconeumol 2013;49:405-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Weissferdt A, Kalhor N, Rodriguez Canales J, Fujimoto J, Wistuba II, Moran CA. Spindle cell and pleomorphic (”sarcomatoid”) carcinomas of the lung: An immunohistochemical analysis of 86 cases. Hum Pathol 2017;59:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Vieira T, Girard N, Ung M, Monnet I, Cazes A, Bonnette P, et al. Efficacy of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung sarcomatoid carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:1574-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Baldovini C, Rossi G, Ciarrocchi A. Approaches to tumor classification in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. Lung Cancer (Auckl) 2019;10:131-49.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Pelosi G, Sonzogni A, De Pas T, Galetta D, Veronesi G, Spaggiari L, et al. Review article: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas: A practical overview. Int J Surg Pathol 2010;18:103-20.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Venissac N, Pop D, Lassalle S, Berthier F, Hofman P, Mouroux J. Sarcomatoid lung cancer (spindle/giant cells): An aggressive disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:619-23.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Rossi G, Cavazza A, Sturm N, Migaldi M, Facciolongo N, Longo L, et al. Pulmonary carcinomas with pleomorphic, sarcomatoid, or sarcomatous elements: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 75 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:311-24.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Park JS, Lee Y, Han J, Kim HK, Choi YS, Kim J, et al. Clinicopathologic outcomes of curative resection for sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung. Oncol 2011;81:206-13.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Raveglia F, Mezzetti M, Panigalli T, Furia S, Giuliani L, Conforti S, et al. Personal experience in surgical management of pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1742-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Mochizuki T, Ishii G, Nagai K, Yoshida J, Nishimura M, Mizuno T, et al. Pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung: Clinicopathologic characteristics of 70 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:1727-35.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Nakajima M, Kasai T, Hashimoto H, Iwata Y, Manabe H. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung: A clinicopathologic study of 37 cases. Cancer 1999;86:608-16.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Lococo F, Rapicetta C, Cardillo G, Stefani A, Margaritora S, Leuzzi G, et al. Pathologic findings and long-term results after surgical treatment for pulmonary sarcomatoid tumors: A multicenter analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;103:1142-50.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Yendamuri S, Caty L, Pine M, Adem S, Bogner P, Miller A, et al. Outcomes of sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database analysis. Surg 2012;152:397-402.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Italiano A, Cortot AB, Ilie M, Martel-Planche G, Fabas T, Pop D, et al. EGFR and KRAS status of primary sarcomatoid carcinomas of the lung: Implications for anti-EGFR treatment of a rare lung malignancy. Int J Cancer 2009;125:2479-82.  Back to cited text no. 18
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed219    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded36    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal